Saturday, October 08, 2005

No. 8 Texas A&M Kingsville Slips Past Unranked Bronchos, 41-38

EDMOND, Okla. -- I always seem to blog after the games in which we lose.
(Game Summary from BronchoSports.com)
UCO trailed early 14-0, but came back to take a 38-28 on the first play of the fourth quarter. Upset time, right?
Remember, this is Kingsville. UCO's arch nemesis.

Joel's Sports Meter



As I watched the Javelinas score 13 unanswered points, I couldn't help but think back to our history with these guys. TAMUK leads the series history 17-4. In 1998, we beat Kingsville during the regular season convincly, 38-9. In the NCAA Division II quarterfinals, Jennifer and I watched as the Javelinas pulled out a 24-21 overtime win over then No. 1 ranked UCO as we got drenched at Wantland Stadium. (TAMUK was later forced to forfeit that game due to an inelgible player -- but our playoff run ended.)
They have our number (plus a lot of talent as well).


WEIRD PLAY: In the first quarter, UCO kicker Jason Dixon had a kick blocked. The ball ended up near the left hash mark -- and no one touched it. Most of the players thought the play was dead. But, the whistle had not been blown. A smart TAMUK player picked it up and rumbled far into Broncho territory.
Both teams thought the play was dead and numerous players were shuffling on and off the field.
After the dust settled, the head referee ruled the return was good. There were also offsetting illegal substition penalties on both teams (for all the extra players shuffling on the field thinking the play was dead.)
Unfortunately for UCO, I think the ref was right. No one blew the whistle so the play was not dead. I tried looking through the NCAA rules on a play like this, but I'm more confused now than I ever was.
My theory:The offense can not advance a blocked kick, but it is a live ball (kind of like a punt before the kicking team downs the ball).
Not sure if that is right, but whatever the rule is, that was a weird play.

Broncho-Man?!?

Jennifer told me if I ever painted my belly that she would kill me.
You should all be very grateful.

Defense Wins Championships . . . But An Offense Helps

Is OU that bad? Or is Texas that good?
Yes.
Texas ended its losing streak to the Sooners with a 45-12 rout of Oklahoma Saturday (Oct. 8) at the Cotton Bowl.
Oklahoma's defensive secondary was battered by Texas quarterback Vincent Young. Besides giving up the big 80-yard run by Jamaal Charles, OU's run defense wasn't bad.
OU held Young to 45 yards (below his average of 77). Charles ended up with 116 yards thanks to his big run.
The secondary seemed to struggle (especially when they played zone defense). Young was 14-of-27 with 241 yards and 3 touchdowns. (In the first four games, Young had only thrown 7 touchdown passes.)
The OU defense didn't receive any help from the OU offense. With Adrian Peterson playing very little (3 carries, 10 yards) because of high ankle sprain, redshirt freshman Rhett Bomar (right) could not get the Sooner offense out of first gear.
Will Texas play USC for the title game? Probably.
Will Texas beat USC? Maybe.
Hopefully the Sooners will continue to improve and win a bowl game. All is not lost in Norman. Remember that, Sooner fans.

Even Cats Need The Good Book